Vegetarian Newsletter 3
A Vegetable Crops Extension Publication
University of Florida
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
Cooperative Extension Service
Vegetarian 99-12
FDA Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits
and Vegetables
The Centers for Disease
Control recently released the following information: "To better quantify
the impact of foodborne diseases on health in the United States, we compiled
and analyzed information from multiple surveillance systems and other sources.
We estimate that foodborne diseases cause approximately 76 million illnesses,
325,000 hospitalizations, and 5,000 deaths in the United States each year.
Known pathogens account for an estimated 14 million illnesses, 60,000 hospitalizations,
and 1,800 deaths. Three pathogens, Salmonella, Listeria, and Toxoplasma,
are responsible for 1,500 deaths each year, more than 75% of those caused
by known pathogens, while unknown agents account for the remaining 62 million
illnesses, 265,000 hospitalizations, and 3,200 deaths. Overall, foodborne
diseases appear to cause more illnesses but fewer deaths than previously
estimated." (Source: Food-Related Illness and Death in the United States.
Paul S. Mead, Laurence Slutsker, Vance Dietz, Linda F. McCaig, Joseph S.
Bresee, Craig Shapiro, Patricia M. Griffin, and Robert V. Tauxe. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.).
Significantly, the
incidence of foodborne disease attributed to fruits and vegetables is very
small compared to the total numbers. However, unpasteurized juices and fresh
sprouts have been implicated in recent outbreaks. In October, 1999 the FDA
released two guidance publications on safe sprout handling and testing of
irrigation water in sprout production respectively). Ensuring that our fresh
produce is as safe as possible involves close collaboration of everyone
involved. Produce can become contaminated at any point, beginning in the
field and continuing through packing, handling, shipping and retail.
The U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center
for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) published the very useful
"Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables"
for growers, packers, and shippers about one year ago as part of the Presidentís
Food Safety Initiative. By identifying basic principles of microbial food
safety within the realm of growing, harvesting, packing, and transporting
fresh produce, users of this guide will be better prepared to recognize
and address the principal elements known to give rise to microbial food
safety concerns. Here are the highlights from the guide:
Water Quality
Wherever water comes
into contact with fresh produce, its quality dictates the potential for
pathogen contamination.
Water can be a carrier
of many microorganisms including pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli,
Salmonella spp., Vibrio cholerae, Shigella spp., Cryptosporidium parvum,
Giardia lamblia, Cyclospora cayetanensis, Toxiplasma gondii, and the Norwalk
and hepatitis A viruses. If pathogens survive on the produce, they may cause
foodborne illness. Even small amounts of contamination with some of these
organisms can result in foodborne illness.
In general, the quality
of water in direct contact with the edible portion of produce may need to
be better than the quality of water in which contact with the edible portion
of the plant is minimal.
Agricultural water quality
will vary, particularly surface waters that may be subject to intermittent,
temporary contamination, such as waste water discharge or polluted runoff
from upstream livestock operations. Ground water that is influenced by surface
water, such as older wells with cracked casings, may also be vulnerable
to contamination.
Water quality should
be adequate for its intended use. Where water quality is unknown or cannot
be controlled, growers should use other good agricultural practices to minimize
the risk of contamination.
Practices to help ensure
adequate water quality may include ensuring that wells are properly constructed
and protected, treating water to reduce microbial loads, or using alternative
application methods that reduce or avoid water-to-produce contact.
Processing water should be of such quality that it does not contaminate
produce.
Practices to Ensure
and Maintain Water Quality. Perform periodic water sampling and microbial
testing; Change water as necessary to maintain sanitary conditions; Clean
and sanitize water contact surfaces, such as dump tanks, flumes, wash tanks,
and hydrocoolers, as often as necessary to ensure the safety of produce;
Install backflow devices and legal air gaps, as needed, to prevent contamination
of clean water with potentially contaminated water (such as between potable
water fill lines and dump tank drain lines; Routinely inspect and maintain
equipment designed to assist in maintaining water quality, such as chlorine
injectors, filtration systems, and backflow devices, to ensure efficient
operation.
Prevention of contamination
is preferred over application of antimicrobial chemicals after contamination
occurs.
However, antimicrobial
chemicals in processing water are useful in reducing microbial build-up
in water and may reduce microbial load on the surface of produce. Washing
fresh produce can reduce the overall potential for microbial food safety
hazards. This is an important step since most microbial contamination is
on the surface of fruits and vegetables. If pathogens are not removed, inactivated,
or otherwise controlled, they can spread to surrounding produce, potentially
contaminating a greater proportion of the produce. A number of post-harvest
processes, such as hydrocooling, use of dump tanks, and flume transport,
involve a high degree of water-to-produce contact. Packers should follow
good manufacturing practices to maximize the potential for these processes
to assist in cleaning produce.
Manure and Municipal Biosolids 
Growers should follow
good agricultural practices for handling animal manure or biosolids to minimize
microbial hazards.
Properly treated manure
or biosolids can be an effective and safe fertilizer. Untreated, improperly
treated, or recontaminated manure or biosolids used as a fertilizer, used
to improve soil structure, or that enters surface or ground waters through
runoff, may contain pathogens of public health significance that can contaminate
produce.
Good agricultural practices
for the use of animal manure or biosolids include treatments to reduce pathogens
and maximizing the time between application to production areas and harvest
of the crops.
Growers purchasing
manure should obtain a specification sheet from the manure supplier for
each shipment of manure containing information about the method of treatment.
Animal feces is a known
source of pathogens that can cause foodborne illness.
A particularly dangerous
pathogen, Escherichia coli O157:H7, is known to originate primarily from
ruminants such as cattle, sheep and deer, which shed it through their feces.
In addition, animal (and human) fecal matter are known to harbor Salmonella,
Cryptosporidium, and other pathogens. Domestic animals should be excluded
from fresh produce fields, vineyards, and orchards during the growing season.
In addition, high concentrations of wildlife (such as deer or waterfowl
in a field) may increase the potential for microbial contamination.
Worker Health and Hygiene
Infected employees who
work with fresh produce increase the risk of transmitting foodborne illnesses.
Be aware of existing
state and Federal regulations regarding standards for worker health, hygiene
and sanitation practices during the growing, packing, holding, and transport
of human food. Train all employees to follow good hygienic practices.
Sanitary Facilities
Operations with poor
management of human and other wastes in the field or packing facility can
significantly increase the risk of contaminating produce.
Toilet facilities should
be accessible. Toilet facilities should be properly located. Toilet facilities
and handwashing stations should be well supplied. All facilities should
be kept clean.
Field Sanitation
Poor management of human
and other wastes in the field can significantly increase the risk of contaminating
produce.
Microbial contamination
or cross-contamination of fresh produce during pre-harvest and harvest activities
may result from contact with soils, fertilizers, water, workers, and harvesting
equipment. Any of these may be a source of pathogenic microorganisms. Clean
harvest storage facilities prior to use. Discard damaged containers that
are no longer cleanable. Clean containers or bins before using to transport
fresh produce. Ensure that produce that is washed, cooled, or packaged in
the field is not contaminated in the process. Remove as much dirt and mud
as practicable from the produce before it leaves the field. Use harvesting
and packing equipment appropriately and keep it as clean as practicable.
Any equipment used to haul garbage, manure, or other debris should not be
used to haul fresh produce. Keep harvest containers clean to prevent cross-contamination
of fresh produce
Packing Facility Sanitation
It is important to maintain
buildings, fixtures, and other physical facilities, and their grounds, in
good condition to reduce the potential for microbial contamination of produce.
Operations with poor
sanitation in the packing environment can significantly increase the risk
of contaminating fresh produce and water used on produce. Pathogenic microorganisms
may be found on the floors and in the drains in the packing facility and
on the surfaces of sorting, grading, and packing equipment. Without good
sanitary practices, any of these surfaces that come in contact with fresh
produce could be a potential source of microbial contamination. Packers
should employ good sanitation practices as a standard operating procedure
to maintain control throughout the packing operation.
Transportation
The proper transport
of fresh produce from farm to market will help reduce the potential for
microbial contamination.
Transportation operations
include transportation from the field to the cooler, packing facility, and
on to distribution and wholesale terminal markets or retail centers. Microbial
cross-contamination from other foods and nonfood sources and contaminated
surfaces may occur during loading, unloading, storage, and transportation
operations. Wherever produce is transported and handled, the sanitation
conditions should be evaluated. Transporters should separate fresh produce
from other food and nonfood sources of pathogens in order to prevent contamination
of the produce during transport operations.
Workers involved in
the loading and unloading of fresh produce during transport should practice
good hygiene and sanitation practices. Product inspectors, buyers, and other
visitors should comply with established hygienic practices, such as thoroughly
washing their hands before inspecting produce. Inspect trucks or transport
cartons for cleanliness, odors, obvious dirt or debris before beginning
the loading process. Keep transportation vehicles clean to help reduce the
risk of microbial contamination of fresh produce. Maintain proper temperatures
to help ensure both the quality and safety of fresh produce. Load produce
in trucks or transport cartons in a manner that will minimize damage.
Traceback
The ability to identify
the source of a product can serve as an important complement to good agricultural
and management practices intended to minimize liability and prevent the
occurrence of food safety problems.
(Brecht, Ritenour, and Sargent, Vegetarian 99-12)
1998-1999 Oriental Vegetable Introduction in South Florida
Mr. Ping Qiao, a scientist
with the Division of Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services, initiated several field trails during October 1998-September
1999 to conduct preliminary performance tests of 33 oriental vegetable cultivars
on a calcareous gravelly soil at the Tropical Research and Education Center,
Homestead. The seeds of most cultivars were sowed in seedling plates and
transplanted into field beds under plastic mulch when the seedlings had
3-5 true leaves. Some of them, like radish and amaranth, were sowed directly
into the field beds. The bed height was about 8 inches and each bed was
provided with 1 or 2 irrigation drip lines. The distance between beds was
6 feet. Some insecticides and nematicides were applied when making beds
to control the pests in the soil. The Centerís farm manager was in charge
of irrigation, fertilization and pest management. In spite of diligent pest
control interventions some cultivars were damaged by thrips, mites or pickleworms.
Doubtless these losses could be minimized though additional experience.
The experimental results
are summarized in the table. The following preliminary conclusions were
reached:
- Regardless of the season many cultivars of oriental vegetables
can be produced successfully in south Florida. In fall and winter,
all hardy and semihardy vegetables and some warm season vegetables
grow very well. In particular the various species of Brassica and
Raphanus sativus, Lactuca sativa var. angustana can be relay planted
many times and supplied for 4-5 months. Crowndaisy, chrysanthemum
and mustard green can be harvested many times from the same planting
provided that the plant root systems are protected from damage during
harvest. Even napa was harvested more than one time from the same
planting. During spring and summer, all warm season oriental vegetables
and some hardy and semihardy oriental vegetables grow well. These
include beans, cucurbits, solanaceous crops, amaranth, etc. Of course,
the control of diseases and insects is very important for all crops,
especially during the warm wet summer period.
- Some cultivars of radish and asparagus lettuce were judged to
be sufficiently promising for testing farm scale production. These
include Qiatouqing, Xinlinmei, Yuanyiewosun, and Amaranth.
- Experimental results showed that some varieties of napa and pak
choi developed flower stalks prior to harvest. Both bolting varieties
of napa and pak choi Early #5 and Aijiaoqing, respectively,
originated from a low latitude region of China. To avoid the problem
of bolting, varieties form higher latitudes need to be evaluated.

Scientific Name
|
Common Name
|
Variety
|
Date
Planted
|
Date Transplanted
|
Rows Per Bed
|
Distance In Row (ft.)
|
Date Harvested
|
Comment
|
Price in
Store
|
Brassica pekinensis
|
Pet-tsai, Napa
|
Blues
|
10-25-98
|
11-25-98
|
2
|
2
|
01-12-99
|
Very good
|
$0.59/lb
|
| |
|
|
11-20-98
|
12-22-98
|
2
|
2
|
02-15-99
|
Very good
|
$0.59/lb
|
| |
|
|
12-05-98
|
01-11-99
|
2
|
2
|
02-28-99
|
Very good
|
$0.59/lb
|
| |
|
|
01-09-99
|
02-05-99
|
2
|
2
|
04-07-99
|
Very good
|
Not available
|
| |
|
AVRDC
|
10-25-98
|
11-25-98
|
2
|
1
|
12-28-98
|
Very good
|
Not available
|
| |
|
Early #5
|
12-08-98
|
01-19-99
|
2
|
2
|
02-28-98
|
Bolting
|
Not available
|
| |
|
Taiwan
|
10-25-98
|
11-25-98
|
2
|
1
|
12-15-98
|
Very good
|
Not available
|
| |
|
|
12-16-98
|
|
4
|
1
|
02-02-99
|
Very good
|
Not available
|
Brassica chinensis
|
Pakchoi
|
Qingjiangcai
|
10-25-98
|
11-25-98
|
2
|
1
|
12-15-98
|
Very good
|
$0.79/lb
|
| |
|
|
12-16-98
|
|
4
|
1
|
02-02-99
|
Very good
|
$0.79/lb
|
| |
|
Aijiaoqing
|
10-25-98
|
11-25-98
|
2
|
1
|
12-15-98
|
Bolting
|
$1.29/lb
|
| |
|
Fenpiqing
|
12-16-98
|
|
4
|
1
|
02-02-99
|
Fair
|
Not available
|
| |
|
Shanghaiqing
|
12-16-98
|
|
4
|
1
|
02-02-99
|
Fair
|
Not available
|
| |
|
Wuyueman
|
12-16-98
|
|
4
|
1
|
02-02-99
|
Very good
|
Not available
|
B. alboglabra
|
Gailan
|
Baihuajielan
|
10-25-98
|
11-25-98
|
2
|
1
|
12-28-98
|
Good
|
$1.85/lb
|
B. juncea
|
Green Mustard
|
Xiuelihong
|
11-25-98
|
|
4
|
1
|
01-15-99
|
Very good
|
Not available
|
| |
|
|
01-19-99
|
|
4-
|
1
|
03-09-99
|
Very good
|
Not available
|
Chrysanthemum coronarium
|
Crowndaisy
|
Tonghao
|
11-25-98
|
|
4
|
1
|
01-15-99
|
Very good
|
$2.99/lb
|
Vigna sesquipedalis
|
Yard-long bean
|
Jiangdou
|
10-25-98
|
11-25-98
|
1
|
1
|
01-05-99
|
Insects
|
$1.39/lb
|
Lagenaria siceraria
|
Bottle gourd
|
Niutuihulu
|
10-25-98
|
12-22-98
|
1
|
2
|
02-15-99
|
Good
|
$0.69/lb
|
| |
|
|
04-04-99
|
04-29-99
|
1
|
2
|
06-06-99
|
Good
|
$0.69/lb
|
| |
|
Piaohulu
|
06-18-99
|
07-06-99
|
1
|
2
|
08-20-99
|
Fair
|
None
|
Benincasa hispida
|
Wax gourd
|
Yuandonggua
|
10-25-98
|
12-22-98
|
1
|
2
|
03-20-99
|
Very good
|
$0.79/lb
|
| |
|
|
04-05-99
|
05-03-99
|
1
|
2
|
07-05-99
|
Very good
|
$0.79/lb
|
Solanum melongena
|
Long eggplant
|
Changqiezi
|
10-25-98
|
01-10-99
|
2
|
2
|
03-19-99
|
Very good
|
$0.99/lb
|
| |
|
|
05-17-99
|
06-14-99
|
1
|
2
|
08-21-99
|
Very good
|
$0.99/lb
|
Cucumis sativus
|
Chinese cucumber
|
|
12-22-98
|
01-24-99
|
1
|
1
|
02-26-99
|
Good
|
None
|
| |
|
|
05-19-99
|
06-14-99
|
1
|
1
|
07-21-99
|
Insects
|
None
|
Lactuca sativa Var. augustana
|
Asparagus Lettuce
|
Yuanyewesum
|
12-08-98
|
01-19-99
|
2
|
1
|
03-21-99
|
Very good
|
None
|
| |
|
|
01-13-99
|
02-11-99
|
2
|
1
|
04-09-99
|
Very good
|
None
|
Luffa acutangula
|
Chinese okra
|
Lengjiaosigua
|
04-20-99
|
05-19-99
|
1
|
2
|
09-20-99
|
No fruit in summer
|
$0.99/lb
|
Luffa cylindrica
|
Sponge gourd
|
Duansigua
|
04-20-66
|
05-19-99
|
1
|
2
|
07-05-99
|
Very good
|
$0.79/lb
|
Amaranthus tricolor
|
Amaranth
|
Hongxiancai
|
04-13-99
|
|
4
|
1
|
05-20-99
|
Very good
|
$1.45/lb
|
Brassica rapa var. Parachinesis
|
Choy sum
|
Youcaixin
|
06-21-99
|
|
2
|
1
|
07-25-99
|
Very good
|
$1.39/lb
|
Cucurbita pepo var. condensa
|
Summer squash
|
Xihulu
|
04-12-99
|
05-19-99
|
1
|
2
|
07-25-99
|
Good
|
|
Cucurbita maxima
|
Winter squash
|
Sungua
|
04-12-99
|
05-19-99
|
1
|
2
|
07-31-99
|
Fair
|
|
Cucurbita moschata
|
Squash
|
Changnangua
|
04-12-99
|
05-19-99
|
1
|
2
|
07-31-99
|
Good
|
Not available
|
| |
|
Yuannangua
|
04-12-99
|
05-19-99
|
1
|
2
|
07-31-99
|
Good
|
Not available
|
| |
|
Shidun nungua
|
04-12-99
|
05-19-99
|
1
|
2
|
07-31-99
|
Very good
|
Not available
|
| |
|
Ten sisters
|
04-12-99
|
05-19-99
|
1
|
2
|
07-25-99
|
Very good
|
Not available
|
Raphanus sativus
|
Radish
|
Yuanluobe
|
12-16-98
|
|
2
|
1
|
02-05-99
|
Very good
|
Not available
|
| |
|
Changluobe
|
12-16-98
|
|
2
|
1
|
02-25-99
|
Very good
|
$0.59/lb
|
| |
|
Qiaotouqing
|
12-16-98
|
|
2
|
1
|
02-25-99
|
Very good
|
Not available
|
| |
|
Xinlimei
|
12-16-98
|
|
2
|
1
|
02-25-99
|
Very good
|
Not available
|
(Li, Vegetarian 99-12)
Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation, Spring 1999
Cantaloupe varieties
were evaluated at the Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Bradenton
in the spring 1999 season. The trial included 27 entries.
Production Practices
The EauGallie fine
sand was prepared in late February by incorporation of 0-0.8-0 lb N-P205-K20
per 100 linear bed feet (lbf). Beds were formed and fumigated with methylbromide:
chloropicrin, 67:33 at 2.3 lb/100 lbf. Banded fertilizer was applied in
shallow grooves on the bed shoulders at 2.34-0-3.25 lb N-P205-K20/100
lbf after the beds were pressed and before the black polyethylene mulch
was applied. The total fertilizer applied was equivalent to 203-70-283 lb
N-P205-K20/acre. The final beds were 32
in. wide and 8 in. high, and were spaced on 5 ft centers with six beds between
seepage irrigation/drainage ditches which were on 41 ft centers.
Twenty-seven cantaloupe
hybrids were direct seeded on 12 March in holes 2 ft apart that were punched
in the black polyethylene mulch. The 20 ft long plots contained 10 plants
each. Fourteen of the entries were replicated four times in a randomized,
complete block design. The remaining thirteen entries were planted in duplicate
plots. Weed control in row middles was by cultivation and application of
paraquat. Pesticides were applied as needed for control of silverleaf whitefly
(endosulfan, abamectin, and paraffinic oil), downy mildew (chlorothalonil
and azoxystrobin), and lepidopteris larvae (Bacillus thuringiensis and methomyl).
Plant stand counts recorded just before the vines grew together showed no
significant differences among plots.
Cantaloupes were harvested
ten times beginning on 20 May and ending on 11 June. Marketable fruit were
separated from culls that included fruit weighing less than 1.5 lb or that
were cracked, rotted, or poorly shaped. Observations were made on fruit
shape, sutures, and netting. Soluble solids were determined with a hand-held
digital refractometer on several fruit from each entry on several harvest
dates.
Results
Replicated Trial. Early
yields, as represented by the first three of ten harvests ranged from 0
for ëDesert Queení to 177 cwt/acre for ëDesert Princessí. Eight other entries
had early yields similar to those of ëDesert Queení. Average fruit weight
of early harvested cantaloupes ranged from 3.2 pounds for ëZodiací to 7.2
pounds for ëViennaí. Three other entries had fruit weight similar to ëViennaí.
Soluble solids, a measure of sweetness, varied from 7.8% for ëZodiací to
12.2% for SME 7124. Very good internal quality is used to describe cantaloupes
containing not less than 11% soluble solids. Using this criterion, only
ëAllstarí, ëAthenaí, ëCordeleí, SME 7122 and SME 7124 would qualify for
the very good internal quality designation.
Total yield in the
replicated trial varied from 346 cwt/acre for SMX 7204 to 688 cwt/acre for
SMX 7119. Eight other entries had yields similar to those of SMX 7119. Average
fruit weight ranged from 3.7 pounds for ëDesert Queení to 6.8 pounds for
ëViennaí. Soluble solids ranged from 9.0 for ëZodiací and ëCruiserí to 10.8
for ëEclipseí. Cull fruit ranged from 30 cwt/acre for ëCruiserí to 139 cwt/acre
for SMX 7110. Stem-end cracks, fruit rots, and undersize fruit were the
principal defects leading to cull fruit.
Observational Trial. Early yields varied from 0 in ëDallasí, HMX 7607, RML
6977, and WC 10 to 296 cwt/acre in RML 6971. Average fruit weight of those
entries that were harvested ranged from 3.3 pounds for RML 5462 to 7.0 pounds
for WC 11. Soluble solids varied from 9.8% for HMX 7604 to 15.3% for ëCaroleí.
Total yield ranged
from 231 cwt/acre for ëDallasí to 677 cwt/acre for HMX 5587. Nine other
entries had yields similar to those of HMX 5587. Average fruit weight varied
from 2.9 pounds for ëSuper 45í to 6.9 pounds for RML 6969. The range of
soluble solids was from 9.3% for WC 11 to 11.9% for ëCaroleí. WC 10, RML
6976, ëCaroleí, ëSuper 45í, and ëDallasí could claim the very good internal
quality designation. Cull fruit varied from 18 to 128 cwt/acre because of
stem-end cracks, fruit rots, and undersized fruit.
Those readers needing
more details should request Research Report BRA 1999-09 from the author.
(Maynard, Vegetarian 12-99)
Tomato Variety Evaluation, Spring 1999 
Tomato varieties were
evaluated in the spring 1999 season at the Gulf Coast Research and Education
Center, Bradenton. The trials included 27 replicated entries and 66 observational
entries.
Production Practices
The EauGallie fine
sand was prepared in early February by incorporation of 0-0.8-0 lb. N-P205-K20
per 100 linear bed feet (lbf). Beds were formed and fumigated with methylbromide:
chloropicrin, 67:33 at 2.3 lb/100 lbf. Banded fertilizer was applied in
shallow grooves on the bed shoulders at 2.34-0-3.25 lb N-P205-K20/100
lbf after the beds were pressed and before the black polyethylene mulch
was applied. The total fertilizer applied was equivalent to 203-70-283 lb
N-P205-K20/A. The final beds were 32 in.
wide and 8 in. high, and were spaced on 5 ft centers with six beds between
seepage irrigation/drainage ditches which were on 41 ft centers.
Transplants were set
in the field on 23 February and spaced 18 in. apart in single rows down
the center of each bed. Transplants were immediately drenched with water
containing imidacloprid for silverleaf whitefly control. Four replications
of 10 plants per entry were arranged in a randomized complete block design
in the replicated trial and single 10-plant plots were used in the observational
trial. Plants were staked and tied without pruning.
Plants were scouted
for pests throughout the season. Silverleaf whitefly, lepidopterous larvae,
and leafminers were the primary insects found. Bacillus thuringiensis abamectin,
methomyl, fenpropathrin, endosulfan, esfenvalerate, and paraffinic oil were
used according to label instructions to control insect pest populations
during the season. A preventative spray program using azoxystrobin and chlorothalonil
was followed for control of plant pathogens. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus
affected plants were removed and disposed of early in the season.
Fruit of the replicated
entries were harvested at or beyond the mature-green stage on 20 May and
2 June. Tomatoes were graded as cull or marketable by U.S. Standards for
Grades and marketable fruit were sized by machine. Both cull and marketable
fruit were counted and weighed. Subjective ratings of plant and fruit characteristics
were made on the observational entries.
Results
Total marketable yield
from two harvests ranged from 1778 25-pound cartons/acre for ACR 8608 to
2878 cartons/acre for EX 10069. Fifteen other entries had yields similar
to those of EX 10069. All entries produced yields well above the state average
of 1525 cartons/acre for spring 1997-98. Total yields in spring 1999 were
similar to those obtained in each of the previous five spring seasons at
this location.
Yields of extra large
fruit varied from 1176 cartons/acre for Fla. 7859 to 2303 cartons/acre for
BHN 399. Twelve other entries had extra large fruit yields similar to those
of BHN 399. Large fruit yields ranged from 257 cartons/acre for ASX 202
to 696 cartons/acre for Fla. 7862. Eight other entries had large fruit yields
similar to those of Fla. 7862. Average fruit weight ranged from 5.3 ounces
for Fla. 7859 to 7.0 ounces for BHN 399. Fifteen other entries had average
fruit weight similar to BHN 399. Cull fruit by weight varied from 12% for
EX 10089 and ëFloralinaí to 31% for ACR 8608. The predominant defects were
large blossom-end scars, rough shoulders, and persistent green shoulders.
Those readers needing
more details on this trial should request Research Report BRA-1999-08 from
the author.
(Maynard, Vegetarian 99-12)
Postharvest Horticulture Institute & Industry Tour
The ninth annual Postharvest
Horticulture Institute & Industry Tour is designed for produce industry
professionals, educators, researchers and students involved in such diverse
areas as field and packinghouse management, wholesale and retail sales and
import/export.
The Postharvest Institute
will be held on Monday, 6 March, in the facilities of McCarty Hall on the
campus of the University of Florida in Gainesville. This yearís topic is
"Innovations in Fresh Produce Transportation" and will feature leading experts
presenting the latest practical information for maintaining postharvest
quality of tropical, sub-tropical and temperate fruit, vegetables and ornamental
crops destined for domestic and export markets. A reference notebook and
industry reference materials will also be available.
The Postharvest Institute
will also be held at three UF/IFAS research and educations via live, video-conferencing.
The locations are: Tropical Research & Education Center (Homestead),
Southwest Florida Research & Education Center (Immokalee) and Indian
River Research & Education Center (Ft. Pierce).
The Postharvest Industry
Tour. The tour will provide an opportunity to experience first-hand the
latest technologies for the harvest, handling and shipping of subtropical
and tropical fruits, warm and cool season vegetables and ornamental crops.
Dr. Steven Sargent, Extension Postharvest Specialist, will conduct the tour,
with visits planned to the following areas: Dover/Plant City (strawberry),
southwest coast (vegetable, citrus harvest, packing & cooling; protected
vegetable production) and Tampa (port facilities, a regional produce distribution
warehouse and a major supermarket produce department).
The tour will depart
from Gainesville on Tuesday morning, 7 March, and return to Gainesville
on Friday evening, 10 March. Tour enrollment will be limited to 30 participants.
For more information,
contact Ms. Abbie Fox, Institute Facilitator at 352-392-1928, ext. 235 or
by e-mail at ajfox@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu
Periodic updated information is available on the homepage of the Horticultural
Sciences Department, University of Florida.
This program
is co-sponsored by the Horticultural Sciences Department and the Cooperative
Extension Service, University of Florida; and by the Florida Fruit and Vegetable
Association, Orlando.
(Sargent, Vegetarian 99-12)
Halosulfuron (Sempra) Labeled on Sweet Corn
Halosulfuron (Sempra)
has received labeling for use on sweet corn, field corn, field corn grown
for seed, grain sorghum (milo), popcorn, sugarcane, fallow ground, rice,
turf grass sod, seed farms, and tree nuts (almonds, beechnuts, Brazil nuts,
butternuts, cashews, chestnuts, chinquapins, filberts, hickory nuts, macadamia
nuts, pecans, pistachios, and walnuts (black and English).
For sweet corn used
alone, Sempra may be applied over-the-top or with drop nozzles from the
spike through layby stage of corn.
Applications of b ounces
by weight (0.032 pounds active ingredient) per acre broadcast over-the-top
of corn or with drop nozzles may be made. If necessary a sequential treatment
at b oz product may be applied only with drop nozzles semi-directed or directed
to avoid application into the corn whorl. No more than 2 applications of
Sempra may be made per year in sweet corn.
Avoid cultivation for
at least 7 days following applications. Sempra is extremely active in the
control of yellow and purple nutsedges postemergence. Sempra will also control
common cocklebur, pigweeds, ragweeds, smartweeds and other broadleaf weeds
when applied preemergence to the weeds or when weeds are 1-9 inches tall.
Consult the label for plant back restrictions and other guidelines.
(Stall, Vegetarian 99-12)
Tillam (Pebulate) Receives Supplemental Label
Pebulate (Tillam 6-E)
has received supplemental labeling for use in transplanted tomatoes grown
under polyethylene film mulch and in combination with Telone C-17 or C-35.
Initial Tillam labeling
prohibited hand transplanting tomatoes into treated soil. Among other provisions
of this label is that plants may be set by hand if chemical resistant, Category
A (waterproof) gloves are worn. Tillam may be applied as a broadcast application
prior to bed formation or as a band application to pre-beds at 2 b to 4
quarts per acre.
Do not apply Tillam
6-E in a band immediately in front of bedding discs or other bed forming
equipment. Tillam 6-E must be mixed (incorporated) into the soil immediately
after application. Inject Telone C-17 or C-35 into the bed immediately after
Tillam 6-E application. Apply polyethylene mulch over the finished bed immediately
after Tillam and Telone application.
The supplemental label
must be in the possession of the user at the time of pesticide application.
(Stall, Vegetarian 99-12)
Cabbage Variety Trial 
Fourteen cabbage lines
and varieties were evaluated for yield and other characteristics when grown
in central Florida during winter production. Seeds were started in the greenhouse
on October 6, 1998. Seedlings were transplanted to a Myakka fine sand soil
on November 9, 1998. A randomized block design with four replications was
used with single-row plots 25 feet long by 2.5 feet wide. In-row spacing
was 9.5 inches giving 31 plants per replication. Growing conditions were
excellent. Rainfall was below normal, 5.6 vs 12.6 inches, for November through
February. Overhead irrigation was used when needed to maintain crop growth.
Harvesting began on February 5 with the last harvest March 1, 1999. Each
entry was harvested one time when it was judged to be market mature.
Yield data and other
characteristics rated in this trial are in Table 1.
Green Cup is considered the standard cultivar in this trial and should be
used to make comparison for desirable traits. Eight entries yielded as high
as Green Cup. Only three were significantly lower in yield. Tropicana was
the overall best looking and yielding entry, with Green Cup a close second.
There were two red cabbage
entries and both were excellent in yield, shape, color, and size. Super
Red 80 was judged slightly more uniform in plant type and head shape than
a new line, T-690 from American Takii. Overall, T-690 was more uniform and
higher yielding than most red cabbage evaluated over the past 25 years.
Table 1. Replicated cabbage trial, Sanford, FL, 1998-99.
|
Entry
|
Source
|
Days to harvest
|
Yield/acrev
|
Head
|
Uniformityw
|
Core length (cm)
|
Head
|
Plant colorz
|
|
|
|
Crates
|
Cwt
|
Wt. (lb)
|
% Cut
|
plant
|
head
|
|
shapex
|
covery
|
|
| Tropicana |
Petoseed
|
98
|
1530.9 a
|
7652.8 a
|
3.75 b
|
66.1 ab
|
5
|
5
|
7.87
|
F
|
5
|
G
|
| Cheers |
Am.Takii
|
98
|
1476.5 a
|
7381.0 a
|
3.42 bc
|
70.4 a
|
5
|
3
|
7.08
|
R
|
5
|
G
|
| RCB 28 |
Novartis
|
92
|
1453.7 ab
|
7267.1 ab
|
3.60 bc
|
64.0 ab
|
3
|
4
|
7.70
|
R
|
5
|
G
|
| Bejo 1772 |
Bejo
|
112
|
1439.3 ab
|
7195.1 ab
|
4.33 a
|
57.3 ab
|
2
|
2
|
7.50
|
SR
|
5
|
G
|
| RCB 26 Novartis |
Novartis
|
92
|
1394.3 a-c
|
6969.8 a-c
|
3.29 b-d
|
69.7 a
|
4
|
4
|
5.50
|
SPR
|
4
|
G
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gideon F1 |
Bejo
|
106
|
1288.8 a-c
|
6442.4 a-c
|
3.28 b-d
|
65.1 ab
|
5
|
3
|
6.75
|
R
|
5
|
G
|
| Green Cup |
Am.Takii
|
98
|
1280.9 a-c
|
6402.9 a-c
|
3.20 cd
|
64.2 ab
|
5
|
5
|
7.00
|
RFT
|
5
|
G
|
| Augusta |
Novartis
|
98
|
1232.1 a-c
|
6158.9 a-c
|
2.85 de
|
69.9 a
|
3
|
4
|
7.58
|
R
|
5
|
G
|
| Ramada F1 |
Bejo
|
106
|
1152.6 b-d
|
5761.7 b-d
|
3.44 bc
|
54.0 a-c
|
4
|
3
|
6.79
|
R
|
5
|
G
|
| RCB 25 |
Novartis
|
92
|
1122.8 cd
|
5613.0 cd
|
3.28 b-d
|
57.1 ab
|
4
|
3
|
5.79
|
R
|
5
|
G
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bobcat |
Reeds
|
98
|
1110.3 cd
|
5550.2 cd
|
3.24 b-d
|
55.8 a-c
|
4
|
4
|
5.79
|
R
|
5
|
G
|
| CXB 93256 |
Reeds
|
112
|
870.9 de
|
4353.8 de
|
3.41 bc
|
41.3 c
|
2
|
2
|
7.33
|
SR
|
4
|
BG
|
| Super Red 80 |
Reeds
|
106
|
728.3 e
|
3840.5 e
|
2.49 e
|
50.7 bc
|
5
|
4
|
6.17
|
R
|
5
|
R
|
| T-690 |
Am.Takii
|
106
|
637.6 e
|
3187.5 e
|
2.58 e
|
41.1 c
|
4
|
3
|
5.87
|
R
|
4
|
R
|
vMean separation in columns
by Duncanís Multiple Range Test, 0.05 level.
Wuniformity: 1 = not good; 3 = acceptable; 5 = excellent.
xHead shape: F = flat; R = round; SR = semi-round; SPR
= slightly pointed/round; RFT = round with flat top.
Yhead cover: 1 = not good; 3 = acceptable; 5 = excellent.
Zplant color: G = green; R = red; BG = blue-green. |
(White, Vegetarian 99-12)
|